Aah! A lovely new blog, complete with a team of talented writers and free-thinkers. I will do my very best to offer a contrary view and equally, I will do my very best to defend those views.
There is some confusion about Freemen and Lawful Rebels. I wanted to let you know that there are differences and in this, my first post, I will try to outline those differences.
Everything I say here is bona fide. Every claim I make is absolutely true. All of the information you see below can be found in a heartbeat, thanks to Mr Google.
Sitting comfortably? Good. Allow me to make you uncomfortable.
Known also as Freemen On The Land. The distinction is made because Freemen know that all courts are Admiralty Courts. That is, they deal with statutes, which are Laws Of The Water. Freemen insist on courts de jure (courts by jury) as opposed to courts de facto (a court that functions under colour of authority but whose authority is defective in some procedural form). When a Freeman enters a court he (or she, no sexism in the Freeman Movement. Chicks are accepted as well), demands that he/she enters the court with all inalienable rights intact.
A de facto court does not like this. They do not wish to deal with the man/woman. They wish to deal with the artificial construct or legal fiction. Admiralty courts exist as commercial enterprises and they deal with commerce. For more information on legal fictions, please have a ferret around my blog or Google the term. Set your faces to "Stun" if this new reality is an alien concept to you.
Freemen are, I believe, the ultimate libertarians of our time. They want nothing from the government, and they do not wish to contribute anything to government. Your average Freeman wants to live an unfettered, self-sustaining lifestyle. If he or she chooses, they may take out private health-care, dentistry etc, and pay for the Fire & Rescue service, or the police, as and when or if they need them. Simple enough concept, right? In return they (we) make an oath not to harm, injure, or cause loss to any other men & women on the planet.
This is not a model for freeloading. Freemen want to take nothing as long as they don't have to give anything. This is a very basic description and there are several websites and forums for you to visit to learn more. Try the blogroll at Ranty Barracks if you get stuck.
This is a different kettle of fish entirely.
Lawful Rebels take their guidance, and their instructions, from Magna Carta 1215 Art. 61, which gives all Britons the right, (actually, the obligation), to rebel if the monarch violates her Coronation Oath. She has done so, by herself or by proxy, over three thousand times since 1953. The Labour government tinkered (illegally and unlawfully) with the House of Lords when they passed a Bill of the same name in 1999.
They disallowed (some) hereditary Peers from taking their seats in the HoL despite them having Letters of Patent. In so doing, they diluted the power of the HoL as an Upper Chamber, and as a result, a Barons Committee was formed in 2001. Some 80 Peers got together and selected a Quorum. In turn, the Quorum delegated four Peers to trot up to Buck House to inform Madge that they were dischuffed.
They gave her 40 days to put right the wrongs, (she did not) so they gave her a further 10 days to deliberate the Second Affidavit (known as an Opportunity To Cure), and, although she acknowledged the Barons Committee, she did not correct her oath violations.
Now that all conditions for Lawful Rebellion are met, the way is open for ALL Britons to revoke their allegiance to the monarch and swear it instead to the Barons Committee. Like them, I also sent my First and Second Affidavits to Madge, and more recently I sent a letter to the Barons Committee pledging my allegiance to them. Article 61, never revoked amended or rescinded, gives me the right to ignore any and all statutes issued by the monarch and her government. I am instructed to "..distrain and distress" them in any way I can. Which includes, but is not limited to withholding taxes, and generally being a pain in the arse. I am doing just that.
So, there you have it. I am both a Freeman and a Lawful Rebel. I have seven or eight affidavits in place. An affidavit, more particularly, an unrebutted affidavit, is the single most powerful piece of paper in the land. An unrebutted affidavit becomes the "truth in law". All Respondents were given ample time to deny (or rebut) my Claims. None of them did so. In law, I am untouchable. In practise, I face much hassle and buggeration.
I am, however, prepared to undergo whatever they throw my way. I do what I do for me, for mine, and for you and yours. We have an illegitimate monarch, an illegitimate parliament and a vast underbody of government drones for whom the Grand Illusion must be maintained.
My job is to undo them.
When you do your research and discover that it is your obligation as well, come and find me.
I will help you to do what needs to be done.