Hey! Leave My Reserve Of Protected Species Alone!

November 9, 2011 2 Comments
By

Matthew Pennycook (Labour councillor in the London Borough of Greenwich and a trustee of the Fair Pay Network) on the government’s awfully ‘unfair’ ideas about social housing:

If the coalition government, ostensibly wedded to the creation of “sustainable, inclusive, mixed communities in all areas, both rural and urban”, truly valued these ideals, it would praise tenants that have improved their circumstances rather than penalise them.

Well, leaving aside the utter nonsense that ‘mixed’ communities are somehow the goal, or even something government should be striving towards, just how is it supposedly ‘penalising’ them?

Instead, the housing minister, Grant Shapps, has outlined plans that would force households that collectively earn over £100,000 to pay market rents.

As Tim puts it, ‘My god! The bastards!’

Government ministers waste no opportunity to associate living in social housing with a damaging lack of aspiration, yet this initiative would see a family in social housing with four earners, each on £25,000 a year, perhaps with the two young adults struggling to save for a deposit to buy their first home, having their rent dramatically raised.

And that situation describes what tiny, infinitesimal percentage of cases?

What lies behind this mismatch between a purported belief in mixed communities and the suggestion that social housing should be restricted to those on low incomes? The answer lies in the government’s ideological desire to embed in the public consciousness the notion that social housing is a form of welfare that in itself encourages dependency.

Well, you’re certainly right there; that is what they believe, and furthermore, they are right to do so.

The unintended consequences will be numerous but it is a fair assumption that the policy will result in both an increased cost to the taxpayer in additions to the housing benefit bill and a further decline in the numbers of genuinely mixed communities.

Again – what benefit accrues to the nation from these ‘mixed communities’..?

I can see, of course, just why Matthew wants to maintain a captive preserve of typical Labour voters, dependent on the State, though.

Tags: , , , , , ,

2 Responses to Hey! Leave My Reserve Of Protected Species Alone!

  1. AC1
    November 9, 2011 at 7:16 pm

    Why is there ANY extortion funded subsidy to live in London?

    People should be housed, but at the best value to the taxpayer, and that means outside London.

    • November 10, 2011 at 5:50 am

      The excuse given has always in the past been access to jobs and family support; this desire for ‘mixed communities’ is a relatively new one.

      But hey, there must be something to it, as it worked so well in comprehensive schooling, right?

United Kingdom Time

Subscribe

Email us at contact orphans of liberty [all one word] at gmail dot com

Authors

For more about these renegades, click on the name to go to a short profile:

AK Haart
Churchmouse
James Higham
JuliaM
The Quiet Man

Orphans logo


Feel free to take this for your sidebar.