So we’re all meant to lapse into despondency.
Rule N1 – never believe what they’re trying to put over you – this is psychological warfare and the first step in combatting that is to identify the enemy, his agenda and his weapons. For a start, it’s BS that America has overcome its crisis. A visit to Jesse, Karl or Zero Hedge are sufficient to put that back in its box. In fact, they’re heading for the big one over there.
Secondly, it is true that on the whole, the U.S. does tend to attack crises in a more gung-ho way than we do – after all, we’ve been reduced to simpering wimps and ditherers, incompetent and insecure in our place in the world. That’s as a society, mind, not in the case of many individuals on the right or libertarian side.
One of the reasons I ‘genderize’ in posts and go on about ‘left’ and ‘right’ is sheer orneriness – we’re told not to do so – so I do try to do the opposite and b**g*r up their game as much as possible. Every construct put up by the PTB we can treat as false in the first instance, until proven to hold at least some water. Everything the PCists/socialists/feminists/matriarchists do inevitably goes wrong as it’s always uncannily based on false first premises and therefore results in failure:
Of course it fails to stop it – the causes have nothing to do with anything the NHS or Westminster can deal with. Night follows day. Every forward planning decision these days seems based on lunacy, e.g.
Councils will be handed £5bn to combat obesity: Lansley signals public health revolution after decade of neglect
There is a definite matriarchal pall over our society and over Europe as a whole with all the nannying and infantilization – the word matriarchal here does not refer to rule by women per se [although look at the whole parachutee issue] but rather rule in a way which emphasizes the slant of the Feminin, e.g. someone will miss out, someone is not being nurtured, e.g. the crim’s human rights might be infringed, the minority might be offended, elfansafetee is chagrined that someone might get hurt if he tries to do something, e.g. play conkers.
We need to get it out of our heads that ‘matriarchal’ here means weak or even that it means benign. It’s an extreme at one end of the scale, with patriarchy at the other end, e.g. Hitler, Franco, Stalin and just like left and right, it’s probably truer to see it as a circle, with patriarchy and matriarchy close to each other at one point on the circumference, let’s say ‘in the extreme hemisphere’. It’s bad for both a family and a society to become either patriarchal or matriarchal because it skews things and the one fashionably attacked today is the patriarchal:
The Matriarchal needs equal condemnation and I’m one of the few pundits attacking it as such, which obviously invites misplaced accusations of misogyny and/or insecurity by those who can’t see the patriarchy/matriarchy dichotomy in socio-political terms. It’s not a personal comment on anyone we know and like.
And let’s deal with this “insecurity’ thing and its running mate “inadequacy”. Insecure means having a fear of possible or imagined consequences or a fear that something undesirable ‘might’ happen so we need to legislate on every aspect of people’s lives, just in case there ‘might be’ a hidden danger somewhere. All at huge expense to the taxpayer and paying some bureaucrats massive salaries and ultimate sweetheart payouts when it fails miserably.
Going back to this blog and what it and many others are exposing, it’s hardly imagined consequences we’re talking about. There’s nothing imagined about it – it’s there in black and white. The state creep into our lives, the rise of female infidelity and one parent homes as a career move on the dole, the new utter irresponsibility of the male who’s basically saying f*** you to what’s happening around him, the assault on smoking and drinking – it’s all pressing down on us and we’re being robbed blind by idiots in positions of power who insist on pissing money down the loo on inanities which have nothing whatever to do with the state:
NHS has paid for ‘gender-confused’ children to have puberty-delaying jabs… so they can have sex changes when they’re older
FFS! The patriarchal view is ‘let ’em all fend for themselves’, the matriarchal is ‘quick, let’s get legislation in place to combat imagined social ills’.
The real answer is to get the hell out of this area, for people to rediscover their sanity on such matters, to do some bloody exercise and eat better to get rid of the obesity, to let children grow up as kids without any ideological brainwashing and certainly no sexualization or sexual education except by parents and the university of life and for parents to pull the finger out and take up their responsibilities in the two parent family.
I mean, these things stand out a mile, so why is it so difficult for so many on the other side of politics to understand? The answer is in the drip drip of brainwashing over a long period now.
What sort of lunatic government slashes household incomes, hikes taxes and lets the utilities companies crucify the ordinary citizen as a way to kick-start an economy? Not to mention VAT. The answer is that an emasculated, wastrel government run from Brussels does this. And what’s the net result of all the loving, matriarchal care, concern and enforced tolerance, thought policing and let’s all be nice to each other at taxpayer’s expense?
Yep – absolutely zero result in the positive and considerable success in the negative. Everyone blogging in our burgeoning area of the sphere [it’s not just a few loony rightwingnuts – it’s society wide now, maybe 60-70% of the society] knows what has to be done. The leftists, Westminster, local councils, Common Purpose and Brussels seem either to have no concept what has to be done, don’t wish to know, are resisting common sense with all their negative, one-size-fits-all, buzzword-spitting might …
Or else there is a global agenda and we are, de facto, caught up in particularly vicious, silent war.