Hysterics

Rarely do you come across a Daily Mail article that presses every button in its prurient fascination and faux morality with the darker side of the UK. It even satisfies the powers that be’s desire to spread the blame for child sexual abuse away from its Islamic pets onto the wider populace as a whole, specifically the white indigenous.

Mail.

Girls as young as 11 ‘expect’ to have to perform sex acts on rows of boys for up to two hours at a time in parts of London, a watchdog said as they warned child abuse is rife across Britain.
Deputy Children’s Commissioner Sue Berelowitz said there ‘isn’t a town, village or hamlet in which children are not being sexually exploited’.
In one vile abuse case she uncovered, boys aged 14 and 15 were ‘summoned’ via BlackBerry Messenger to the gang rape of a ‘very, very young girl’ which lasted several days.
She told MPs today: ‘Boys were being called while some were raping the girl to say “come, come, come, you can join in too” and they were arriving and elbowing each other out of the way to rape her.’
Ms Berelowitz said the recent sex abuse case in Rochdale – which involved mostly men of Pakistani origin abusing white girls – was just part of a wider picture of exploitation involving victims and abusers of all races and cultures.

I suppose we should be grateful Ms Berelowitz didn’t use the word ‘Asian’ but frankly it’s a small mercy.
Nor oddly enough do I recall any such mention of arrests for this gang rape, or headlines, certainly the Mail doesn’t link to it, still to give the benefit of the doubt it might be an ongoing case.

‘As one police officer who was the lead in a very big investigation in a very lovely, leafy, rural part of the country said to me: “there isn’t a town, village or hamlet in which children are not being sexually exploited”.
‘I regret to say that there are parts of every single community – white, Pakistani, Afghan, Gypsy and Romany travellers, you name it – who are seeing children as easy access in terms of sexual exploitation. And in terms of victims we are seeing the same sort of profile.’
Ethnic minority victims were ‘too often missed out’.
Speaking about the race issue, she told the committee she had visited a ‘racist’ estate in the north of England where there was routine sexual abuse of children within an all-white community.
‘I have been to gang-associated areas in the north of England.
‘I am thinking of one particular estate which is exclusively white, because it is such a racist estate, where there is a very strong and identified pattern of the white males on that estate sexually exploiting the white females on that estate.
‘So it is really important to hold all of it in mind.’

OK so we’re talking about some kind of paedogeddon here? Yet the headlines rarely seem to bear this out. Yes we know child sexual exploitation goes on and we know it’s a problem exacerbated in part by the ease of communications that we have these days. We do know that the largest abuse uncovered so far involves males of Pakistani origin and also that the state tried to cover it up for years. Something that they wouldn’t do if the perpetrators were ‘English’ yet the evidence of a large scale ‘English’ gang culture sexually abusing young girls is amazingly hard to find. Same oddly enough with any other immigrant culture save those of Pakistani origin.

Yet this evidence will also be used by the powers that be to clamp down (censor) internet access and paves the way to also further intrusions into private media, phone calls the blackberry network, you name it, basically the few areas where free speech happens and they don’t have control. All for the sake of the children (of course)

Frankly this is hysterical nonsense, yet it will serve its purpose, the blame for the sexual exploitation of young girls will be shifted away from the main perpetrators onto the community as a whole and the way is paved for government control of the means of communication.

Win, win, as far as they’re concerned.

As for the Mail, well it will sell papers and fuel the fears of its readership.

Win, win.

The only losers seem to be those who desire free speech and those who seek the truth.

No surprises there then.

16 comments for “Hysterics

  1. June 13, 2012 at 7:04 am

    ‘White indigenous’..? I think you’ll find this is strictly a product of gang culture. It’s unlikely to affect girls named Jemima and Lucinda.

  2. June 13, 2012 at 7:06 am

    And how can an estate (an inanimate object) be racist?

  3. Greg Tingey
    June 13, 2012 at 7:39 am

    I would suggest that these fuckwits go and re-read Laurie Lee’s “Cider with Rosie”.

  4. June 13, 2012 at 9:33 am

    Are we back in Satanic Panic territory where certain people think they can bolster their credibility by claims made on precisely no evidence whatsoever?

    Ten bob says Bea Campbell is near by.

    • June 13, 2012 at 4:28 pm

      If she isn’t now, she will be by the time tomorrow’s CiF is up!

  5. Jeff Wood
    June 13, 2012 at 11:33 am

    WOAR, quite. My bullshit detector just exploded.

  6. Maaarrghk!
    June 13, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    Just read it on the Beeb News site and thought it must be April 1st.

    I can quite honestly say that this is the biggest load of crap I have ever seen in the mainstream media.

    I am more inclined to believe the Daily Sports story about the double decker bus being found on the moon.

    Peeeeeeedophiles are EVREYWHERE. There’s one sitting right next to you right now!

    BOO!

  7. microdave
    June 13, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    “To clamp down (censor) internet access”
    Already happening in Blighty – unless your ISP is BT (for the time being), you won’t be able to access The Pirate Bay without some trickery…

  8. Lord T
    June 13, 2012 at 5:12 pm

    If its so widespread then maybe the laws need to be changed to make it legal. If every city, town, village, hamlet has a group they must be the biggest single group in the UK and isn’t this a democratic country.

    It’s bull. They should track these people down and prosecute them.

  9. TediousTantrums
    June 13, 2012 at 5:12 pm

    Wasn’t there a huge multi-million pound investigation into sex rings, children and females being trafficked for the sex trade carried out by the MET and other forces around the UK? Wasn’t it abandoned because they couldn’t find much at all in the way of sex trafficking and exploitation?

    But now they know there is sexual exploitation taking place in every town and village in the country? Did the police do their job properly a few years ago or is this just more racist nonsense by white people on white people?

    As far as we know at the moment there is a real trend in some Pakistani males assaulting young white girls. This is pedophile behavior but I don’t remember that term being used during the recent trial. Other trials are happening or about to happen.

    Morals out the window in support of pedophiles who are almost exclusively from from one ethnic community.

  10. tipple
    June 13, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    You need to factor in the black gangs too. Horrible people with no respect for women or men for that matter. They have forcible group sex to bond within the gang.Dem girls go down all the way they are told to or they get punished.

  11. June 14, 2012 at 10:49 am

    I’m sorry, but you aren’t allowed to mention this problem, especially if it involves a group of three or four black youths ganging up on an Argentinian architecture student.

    But you can mention it if the gang are white. Then it’s alright.

  12. Tatty
    June 14, 2012 at 11:59 am

    Dear Media

    Nobody ever said that paedophilia isn’t a horrific problem endured by all children in the UK in all races and cultures.

    It’s the massive effort that The Media in conjunction with The Authorities put into trying to hide the obvious and widespread incidents of paedophilia amongst the pakistani/afghan muslim population perpetrated against white girls that pissed us all off.

    Oh and that… whilst The Media claims it is rife in all races and cultures in the UK… The Authorities consistently do fuck all about it.

    Don’t lie in future, ta.

    Yours faithfully
    The Public.

    P.S. Children having sex with other children has been condoned, encouraged and allowed by The Authorities so why is this being directly compared with adults having sex with children ? To fascillitate a smoother transition into legalising paedophilia, perhaps ? Rape is Rape whether perpetrated by a “child” up the age of 18 years old or an “adult” over the age of 18 and an entirely different subject.

    A full page article on that in your next edition, please. 😐

Comments are closed.