Quite dismayed to get the following by email:
The great ‘Elite’, the Illuminati, the Bilderburg Group et al. Blame the Pope or some Marxist, anyone or few will do just as long as we overlook the Prime Suspect – ordinary office-holders out to cling to their particular greasy pole.
That is an amazing statement, dissing the work of many people who’ve bothered doing the digging and have come up with the facts and figures. An example is Ken Craggs, another is Graham Roberts, another is Witterings from Witney. Ian Parker-Joseph brings today’s.
This is no theory, no wild speculation, it is a slowly built case which joins no dots without evidence. In the case of CP itself, there were questions in parliament about the public moneys given to it. If you follow those links and bother reading the articles, you’ll see the connections.
Now here’s another. At the beginning of OoL, I put up a post about the World Core Curriculum. Now, as an educator of several decades, you’d think I might know a teensy bit about education. There is a WCC and it has resulted in the setting up of International Schools all over the world – I should know because I’ve been applying to some of them, going to interview and thus need to know the curriculum, yes?
Part of that curriculum is sex for children. It should never ever have been on the curriculum, except in special sessions by arrangement with participating parents but we’ll let that go.
All right, let’s come back to this issue of the global agenda. Here is a UN pdf on the very topic of child sex:
Here is the front page and the summary:
If you don’t think that is one of the most disgusting things you’ve seen, then we’re clearly not even on the same page.
OK, let’s go to Agenda 21. Have any of you met David of Witterings from Witney? The last thing he is is a conspiracy theorist but what else can he do when he’s faced with this:
“….after Agenda 21 was adopted, an international organization known as the “International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives” (ICLEI) was established to help implement the goals of Agenda 21 in local communities.”
If that is not interference by an outside body, then I don’t know what it is. And this:
And of course, they have their summits and check that the agenda is being implemented:
The upcoming World Summit on Sustainable Development will aim to answer the following questions, among others:
What has been accomplished since 1992?
What have the participating countries done so far to implement Agenda 21?
Have they adopted the National Sustainable Development Strategies as they agreed they would by 2002?
Have they ratified the conventions that aim to prevent loss of biodiversity or ensure women’s rights as they agreed to do in 1992?
But this is the bit which gets me – Millennium Papers – Issue 2 (page 5):
Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress.
This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21.
So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth.
That is the UN’s own paper saying that. Now I ask anyone who reads that and still continues to say “conspiracy theory” – just how much evidence do you need?
Now, I remember mentioning Common Purpose to David one day some years back and he just smiled. Like the one who sent that email, he had not gone into it in detail, he didn’t know, except at a distance and yet he took a point of view based on that. As it became painfully apparent what Common Purpose were really up to and who they were, whence they came, he started looking at it and finally did a post around them.
The Bilderbergers are another thing. Blair was asked if he’d attended the 1997 and he lied. He was asked about 1993 and lied. Why would he feel he had to lie? And yet subsequently, all the Bilderberg is is a sideshow for the leaders, when they could just as well meet under any other banner, e.g. World Economic Forum. It was just something for the anti-globalists to get their teeth into.
There’s this feeling amongst those who don’t know because they haven’t bothered exploring in depth that those who do explore must, by definition, be loons. What this confuses is that what they come up with is loonery all right but it’s not the loonery of the investigators but of the investigated themselves.
An example. I looked into the climate thing, as did many and came up with an oft-quoted set of data. One thing quite significant was that one of the main global players was Maurice Strong, of Green infamy and he had henchmen in Davidson and McLaughlin who devised the Valdez Principles which defined the global climate lunacy we’ve been fighting ever since.
Now, this is what they’re into:
The Shamballa force is in reality Life itself; and Life is a loving synthesis in action. We also used the Six Laws and Principles of the New Age to lead us towards creating a vision of how these principles might create patterns for the New Civilization humanity will be constructing over the next 2500 years.
There’s the loonery – in their heads. Yet we are the ones accused of loonery because we speak of it. Going back to the Bilderberg. Yes, it did exist, it was devised by Prince Whatsit, one of the set many have written of before – nasty piece of work – and it was his attempt to have a say in the global agenda, just as the CFR tries to, as the TLC tries to, as the BIS actually does, as Tavistock/Chatham House does.
Everyone wants to be the chief.
Here’s the instigator of the EU, the Club of Rome. Look at the list – these are not just greasy pole climbers although it includes them, naturally, in the same way the EU issues a recommendation and Cameron takes it as a directive, as did Brown and Blair before him.
This is short-and-curlies stuff.
Now, let’s go back to that original statement at the top: “the Prime Suspect – ordinary office-holders“. That’s a bit like saying that the Member for Thames is the Prime Suspect, even though she was parachuted in by the PM under the directive of the EU. Sure she’s corrupt and wants to “cling to [her] particular greasy pole” but in the name of all that is good, why would you look only at this person, the marionette and not at the puppetmaster, particularly when there is so much evidence that the puppetmaster is the active agent in it all?
In a similar way, why would you say that Penny Mordor, who voted for gay”marriage” is the Prime Suspect when everyone knows it was Cameron behind it and fewer know it was the globalist brethren Clarke and Co, in thrall to Brussels and the agenda? Sure Penny Mordor was culpable. In a similar way, the Chipmunk was caught with her snout in the trough:
But they’re not the prime movers. I mean, seriously, just look at the “quality” of her mind – could she organize a global movement?
These ordinary office holders do damage, for sure but who is employing them and on what basis? And who devised that basis? There is always cause and effect.
Is there a Mastermind?
What was being mocked by the emailer was that there is some Mastermind behind it all. Well, that depends on your worldview. Any Christian immediately quotes Ephesians 6:12 and there’s your mastermind. Now if you’re of the opinion that Christianity is loonery and Jesus of Nazareth is a nutcase, then you’re not going to accept that mastermind behind the troubles.
You’re more likely to see different groups of likeminded individuals dedicated to oppressing a humanity they despise and fighting to be the most influential among them. So it’s a constant, bubbling struggle among the Triads, CIA, European Black Nobility etc. to see who can out-atrocity the other.
The individuals can be identified readily – Trichet, Davignon, Bernard, Blair etc. etc. The issue is not who they are but whom they’re in thrall to. Cameron is most certainly in thrall, if only to the gay lobby but indications are it is the European globalist mafia he is in thrall to and homosexuality is one of the characterizing features of that lot. And Boris has exactly the same masters, although he covers it better with a cloak of humour and buffoonery.
In practical terms, you can see it in the way the net is being drawn in – CCTV everywhere, loss of freedoms all over the place, disarming the population to leave them vulnerable to government/crims and in all of that, there is certainly the element of sheer incompetence of the people entrusted in carrying it out. But clever men [the minority] can use that incompetence to soak up guilt.
If I were to overload my council employees whom I’ve selected as compliant deadheads in the first place, so that they could not apply due diligence and at the same time, implement new procedures which have people’s personal records readily available on the system and if I overload the working days of those people in pointless bureaucratic paperwork, on pain of losing their jobs, then if I sit back after that, sooner or later, one of those is going to leave a disc on a bus seat on the way home. Law of averages.
A clever person, by definition, is not going to leave a trail leading to him or her. The question of One Mastermind will not be resolved by those of differing worldviews. What can be agreed is that the political moves in the past few decades have been steadily more nasty and they particularly deteriorated from the second half of the 90s, perhaps completing the job begun by Maggie. Are the trains any better today for their privatization?