Maybe, This Time, Intended Consequences?

June 26, 2013 2 Comments
By

New planning rules introduced on Friday May 31 would allow bookies to move into empty shops without needing permission to change the use of premises.

Ministers hope this will prevent high streets turning into ghost towns but critics argued the new legislation would means towns could be overrun by bookmakers and payday lenders.

Hmmm, a usual hopelessly drawn-up bit of legislation, or a crafty way to get an end run around the usual suspects?

Councillor Nilgun Canver, the cabinet member for the environment, said such shops often target poorer areas of the borough.

They can’t be that ‘poor’, can they, if these shops can still make a living!

“Betting shops are clustered in some of the borough’s poorest areas and this limits consumer choice, inhibits regeneration and is of little benefit to the local economy or residents. ”

What, you mean they don’t pay business rates? And no-one in the area uses them?

That can’t be right…

“There is also evidence of anti-social and criminal behaviour associated with these shops as hard pressed gamblers lose substantial funds on the machines.”

Well, if that’s the case, then try and get them closed down. Like you do with pubs or nightclubs. It should be easy, shouldn’t it?

Cllr Canver said: “The council has tried several avenues to try to reduce betting shop clusters it does not have sufficient powers or finances to address this problem.

“We pressed the Government to introduce a separate planning category for betting shops that would mean them needing planning permission to change the use of a retail unit into a betting shop and allowing the views of the community to be taken into account before granting planning permission but the Government did the opposite.”

I wonder why…?

Did they think they’d have to provide this loophole to avoid the people like Cllr Canver, who, when they say ‘lack of choice’, really mean people making choices of which they don’t approve?

Tags: , , , , ,

2 Responses to Maybe, This Time, Intended Consequences?

  1. June 26, 2013 at 10:41 am

    People moan about the decline of High Streets, and then oppose the actual businesses that want to set up there such as bookies and takeaways. I get the impression some councillors would prefer to see empty units if they can’t have organic cafés and nice little wool shops.

  2. Andrew Duffin
    June 26, 2013 at 12:01 pm

    “Planning” generally is out of control.

    I can see the need to decide where there ought to be “shops” and where there ought not to be (but only a little bit – if I want to open a shop in my front room, why not?)

    But as soon as we start(ed) having minute classifications of retail premises, with bureaucratic obeisance to be done – and large fees paid, natch – when you want to change your premises from one sort of shop to another very slightly different sort of shop, then the system is doing more harm than good.

    As we seen this case.

United Kingdom Time

Subscribe

Email us at contact orphans of liberty [all one word] at gmail dot com

Authors

For more about these renegades, click on the name to go to a short profile:

AK Haart
Churchmouse
James Higham
JuliaM
The Quiet Man

Orphans logo


Feel free to take this for your sidebar.