Ad absurdum

We go on about it, from all the little blogs to some of the MSM these days, we’re told there is no such thing as left and right but this vid demonstrates that there very much is, there are distinct characteristics to it and it results in a downgrading of society into absurdity:

This via Wiggia:

There are clear absurdities in society, from the way government departments deal with you to faux charity bosses on grotesque salaries to council workers paining 13 inch long double lines between two driveways to prevent parking – it goes on and on.

We’re agree it’s absurd and yet we differ on why it’s absurd. The public sector bloats out, we say how much it is costing the taxpayer but the other side ignores that and points to how, since privatization of the railways, of the service utilities, service has gone down and costs have skyrocketed. Our side says remember how bad it was when British Rial was nationalized, how bad everything from the service to the rudeness to the food was.

We have an enormous problem. Whilst government is just going ahead exploiting crises – those two little girls murdered which caused universal CRBs, 7/7 which caused draconian surveillance laws, the breakdown of the family assisted by Cameron in parliament followed by increasing numbers of children taken into care to be paid for by the taxpayer – we can’t agree on how to tackle these things.

We can’t even agree on which issues have priority. One side thinks banning smoking is the main issue and the other thinks Rotherham and the corruption at the top is the main issue.

We can’t even agree on terminology. One lot speaks of the taxpayer, discretion, initiative, small business, common sense, sane immigration levels and the other lot speak of equality and diversity, of health and safety, of racism and sexism.

One lot asks, ‘Well don’t you think it’s wrong to discriminate against another due to race, colour or creed?’ and the other says, ‘Absolutely. Have a foreign wife myself. Now, about the open slather migration -‘ and is interrupted by the other: ‘Racist!’

We’re agreeing on the principles but not on the actuality. And while even our choice of words differs, the people who actually caused all this are sitting pretty, laughing to themselves.

I’m referring to people such as Geoff Mulgan. Interesting bio. Pops up as a sort of ‘thinktank’ for government. Former self-avowed Marxist [even Wiki admits this], he was behind Demos and in turn, Common Purpose, which has now so sullied its reputation it works in secret with its ‘leading beyond authority’ in which its graduates permeate every council,m every key institution and they’re the ones who run the show in this land – the pod people are really here.

And suddenly things go wrong in our society and a crisis needs government to step in and bring in new legislation to solve it. Some time after a CP graduate is ensconced in the mayoral office, a large number of children start being forcibly taken into care to be ‘cared for’ by the state. Wheelie-bin crime is rife. Someone parking partly over a double line is wheel-clamped and then pursued with the full force of the law.

Whilst 1400 Rotherham children are abused and council turns a blind eye, as do the police. Our lot call it ‘Muslim gangs’. The other lot desperately try to pretend it’s nothing to do with Muslims or Asians. And if we say it bloody well is, they call us Racist.

And all the time, the process continues to absurdity in society.

I saw this at close quarters in Russia. Government departments had caused to have been brought in so much overlapping legislation that by definition, you were already a criminal. You had to submit a document but needed to pay at the Post Office first. They would not accept payment unless you had this other document but you couldn’t get that without the first one.

The absurdity did not faze government at all. The shadowy types would be at the end of a phone. You need this document? 5000 roubles. It was delivered in three days. That’s how it worked. That’s where Sweden is headed and where we are headed, under the umbrella of the EU.

And yet left and right here are at loggerheads over priority order of issues and over terminology. And the real crims who caused all this, the Mulgans et al, are laughing. Because they are causing the things mentioned in that video. They caused them, they set them in motion and let the people, in their blind adherence to ideology, get carried along.

If you look at that vid, it’s almost a carbon copy of what is happening here. She speaks at the beginning of one of the Social Democrat leaders over there giving a speech about how there never was a Swedish culture, never had been a Swedish tradition and we [the Swedes] should be jolly grateful for all these new cultures being swept in because they do have binding cultures and we can all learn from them.

Once I can recover my faculties at seeing and hearing that, may I point out that that is precisely what Labour told us and every member of the left, between 1997 and 2010. And where did it lead? The lady in the vid lists the stats of increased social problems.

Will the left stop supporting all these PCist policies, in order to stop all this social disintegration?

No, they’ll argue that it’s not happening or that it’s happening but not at all for those reasons.

And so we fight each other all the way to the bottom of the abyss.

12 comments for “Ad absurdum

  1. Hereward unbowed.
    December 9, 2014 at 1:49 pm

    Creeping Islamification is what frightens me, truly frightens me – we can deal with the left and common purpose on their own.

    But now we face a consolidated attack on so many fronts and by an Axis which includes gormless councillors, taxpayer funded charities[http://harrogateislamicassociation.org/about-us/], the social engineers of social services, the money pumped in by the Wahhabists emanating from the Gulf of Araby, the politicians are silenced by political correctness and an army of well funded lawyers all feeding at the teat of the public funded fatted cows, the police are being overrun and the march of Islam knows no obstacles – even in a town like Harrogate. Have a look to York, a city of no real Muslim population now has two Mosques, one built at a cost of £2 million if you please – I wonder, where did the money came from?
    Harrogate, knocked back its ‘own’ Mosque but they don’t take no for an answer….. Thus, rustle up a front charity [above] and with quisling members on the council to commence the latest ethnic cleansing “Harrogate instalment” – a town of 99% white population only some 5 or 6 years ago.
    In the south the creep out of London goes on apace along the M4/M3 corridors; of course Reading, Guildford but then Swindon and the smaller white towns of Newberry, Banbury – Banbury strewth next Bath, Wells and Taunton, Exeter soon, Plymouth next St Austell and Bideford…….? The creep of Islam by stealth is now an open headlong rush.

    No one bats an eyelid, who will speak for white Yorkshire?

    No one dares say a word, no one.

    We are doomed it is just a matter of time. I always said, it was a death race between de industrialization, financial calamity brought about by the green agenda and the forces of the EU and UK left [liblavCON] and the other apocalyptic horse – Islam, either way we are ****ed.

  2. James Strong
    December 9, 2014 at 2:09 pm

    ‘ it’s wrong to discriminate against another due to race, colour or creed.’

    Why is it wrong to discriminate based on creed?

    It is quite clear that the major problem with immigration is Muslim immigration.
    Islam, as a culture, is inferior to Western European culture. It’s not just that it is different; it is not as good. It is not equal to our culture.

    There are ways of saying this that help in the argument. I ask gays and women what their rights would be in an Islamic state.
    I also make the point that, were the ideas of Islam put forward by middle-aged white men thet would be denounced as similar to Nazis.

    You can come up with your own ideas, but let’s be clear: the problem is Islam. And if saying so opens up accusations of discriminating due to creed we must still keep on saying it.

    • Mudplugger
      December 9, 2014 at 3:43 pm

      Quite right. You don’t have any choice about your race or skin-tone, just as you can’t choose your height or natural hair-colour, therefore any discrimination on those grounds is to be avoided.
      However, creed is a matter of personal choice and, having made a choice, you must learn to live with any consequences, including the fact that others may choose to discriminate against you as a result of your own informed choice.
      Of course, many are brain-washed into their ‘creed’ by their elders at a disgracefully young age – stop that insidious process and the contentious issue may quickly diminish.

    • December 9, 2014 at 3:47 pm

      The way I was meaning was as a general principle. However, as you say, there are creeds and creeds.

    • Viscount Rectum
      December 9, 2014 at 7:43 pm

      The true malady of the English is tolerance,we wallow in it just tell an Englishman how tolerant he is he will love you, tolerance is our mortal (moral)weaknes. We are paying a terrible price for uncritical thinking

      • December 9, 2014 at 8:35 pm

        Who was it who first said that we were tolerant? It now seems to be an injunction – that we have to be tolerant or we’re not being true to our race. In truth the authorities expect us to be passive and give us the odd treat to keep us that way.

        • Viscount Rectum
          December 10, 2014 at 8:38 am

          A Nobel prize has just been bought at auction by a Russian won by an Englishman who dared to give a TRUTHFUL opinion about blacks, look at west Africa and Ebola. Should George Orwell get the Nobel Prize?

  3. December 10, 2014 at 10:13 am

    Yep.

  4. Flyinthesky
    December 10, 2014 at 11:43 am

    Absurdistan is now the biggest country in the world and expanding.

  5. Ed P
    December 10, 2014 at 2:06 pm

    Just as CP-ers have hardly-noticeable lapel pins and code words to identify each other (like all secret societies), perhaps it’s time for all those in favour of freedom and tolerance to use similar tactics.

    How about a lapel pin with “Malsi” on it?

    • December 10, 2014 at 11:14 pm

      OK, I’ll ask – malsi?

      • Ed P
        December 11, 2014 at 7:36 am

        It’s backwards, like the religion!

Comments are closed.