Those working for British people versus those working against

This was made crystal clear today.

On one side, a man with the cojones to tell it as it is today, Farage, his party and what is the mainstream feeling up and down the land.

On the other side, the left-liberal establishment, three party leaders with no cojones between them who would sell Britain out, LibLabCon almost as one party, the captured media and journos, those occupying key positions throughout the land.

In America, the party or leader who gets in is the one saying put America first. In Australia, the one who gets in is the one saying put Australia first. Only in this land is a leader attacked for saying put Britain first.

Don’t you think there’s something quite twisted in that? Some comments I read:

# I don’t know of any government that won’t put it’s own citizens first, except for some unknown reason our own. Farage is correct, there are some people in this country who hate us very much, there is nothing wrong in stating that however much some people might like to stick their heads in the sand and ignore it.

# Could someone please tell me – what is wrong with what Nigel Farage has said? From the murder of Lee Rigby on the streets of London to the bile spouted by Anjem Choudary and other hate preachers it is quite obvious that there are Muslims living in this country who want to see the British “way of life” destroyed.

Nigel Farage has had the courage to say something about it, echoing what many people in this country feel but are scared to say because of the backlash by all the pc liberals and apologists.

Look how quickly the so-called leaders of the three “main” political parties jumped on the band wagon because they are running scared from the truth of what is happening in this country!

Reuters ran a piece emphasizing that everyone in the country had turned on Farage for his remarks, that they were only a small party anyway who would get very few seats. Then they tried to say he was backtracking because he added – all employment law could do with a looking at.

Is that so? Then why not ignore what Farage said? The reason is simple – he taps a feeling running deep inside the indigenous in the country, plus those immigrants who came to assimilate and play their roles as Brits. UKIP represents them.

LibLabCon represent those would sell out the country, including those happy to hack off a British soldier’s head on a street and bomb buses.

This is how another country does it.

UPDATE

My goodness, the out-and-out misrepresentation is astounding. Kent Online, which should be neutral, is running a poll.

The headline was OK:

Nigel Farage sparks anger after claiming bosses should be allowed to recruit on basis of nationality

… but what a bizarre statement – the country should be able to employ people of that country? Er … any problems with that? Every nation on earth, except Britain, does so.

KOL’s true colours came out in the poll:

Do you agree with Nigel Farage’s race comments?

He didn’t make “race comments” except to say UKIP were colour-blind. Hardly controversial. But KOL know very well that “race comments”, written like that, would make the average person think “racist comments”.

kol poll

How long is it going to take?

9 comments for “Those working for British people versus those working against

  1. March 12, 2015 at 5:34 pm

    You are as always correct in what you say.
    Farage will never be popular with MSM because he says what the general population say and does not follow blindly the liberalist left bullshit.
    Any country outside the EU stands for it’s own citizens, this is an EU membership phenomenon and should tell us all we need to know EU membership = the good of the few out weighs the good of the many. Let’s not forget the EU philosophy is “we are all one nation” Europeans BUT we aren’t and there in lies the issue.

    • March 12, 2015 at 7:09 pm

      The number of people though in Britain who either wilfully or ignorantly get it wrong never ceases to surprise me.

  2. Judd
    March 12, 2015 at 8:00 pm

    Maybe the wisdom to see through the propaganda comes with age, though Mrs Judd reckons wisdom finally dawns when you’ve been kicked in the bollocks and knifed in the back enough times by the perma-smiling bastards.

  3. Viscount Rectum
    March 12, 2015 at 8:21 pm

    Feeding Nigel all this wonderfull publicity,the three arseholes leading the opposition assault on Nigel have not the wit to see we support him, we see him as a man who we are growing to (dare I say it?) love, a great leader in the offing. So get stuffed Camerarse. thank you I feel better now.

  4. March 12, 2015 at 9:08 pm

    Survation have Nige ahead by 11% in Thanet South. On the other hand, Lib Dem have 8% but bookies say 31 seats, UKIP on 14% but 3 seats. I saw two articles on Reckless losing but another saying he’ll hold. Hard to know what to think.

  5. Hereward unbowed.
    March 13, 2015 at 12:42 am

    They, well actually that shite hawk blubbery Socialist popinjay and wet fart Jenkins started the ball rolling with his bleedin’ hearts establishment liberals and aided and abetted by the scum party.
    Laughingly it was touted as anti discrimination legislation, it seems obvious to me, that they were really taking the piss.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Relations_Act_1968

    Any statute, a bill which champions and raises the rights of the minority [even an individual] over those of the majority is baleful law and is, at total variance with the precepts of common law – ie it discriminates.
    Everybody on the left and in the media cooed and ah-ed and said what a fine thing it was, the only person who spoke out against this act of perfidy, was of course the perspicacious Mr. Enoch Powell he foretold of how it would discriminate against the ordinary Brits and as usual he was bloody well right.

    One of the elemental corner stones of Frankfurt School ideology is, to promote and sow the seeds of discord and division. Disharmony, where the societal, religious, familial, property ownership – bonds which provided stability for westernized democracies, the Frankfurt School demands this weft of social cohesion to be sundered.

    Granting superior rights, prerogative and favour to an individual over, supplanting those collective safeguards of a free and open society – only engenders imbalance and thus: inequity and injustice. Verily, is it not obvious, that, in the chambers and statutes of the ECHR-ECJ the Frankfurt School is manifest but wasn’t that the plan – see first paragraph – it began in 1965 – 1976.

    The other elephant in the room [yes there are a few] is Multiculturalism but that’s for another day.

  6. March 13, 2015 at 1:46 am

    I thank the stars that I live in Oz where we only have the Greens, the Feminists, the Socialists, Billionaire Palmer’s own party of losers, some very odd ‘conservatives'(their turn in the barrel), more ‘independant’ MPs in the Senate than you can shake a stick at, multiculturalism, Abos, ‘hate’ laws, States galore to give a multiplier effect, Germaine Greer’s annual pilgrimage to find a root, etc. Add to that… we are an island too, and just up a bit are 180 million Muslims.

    I take heart from President Obama’s colourful phrase (‘scusethe pun)…”You didn’t make that”. Too friggin’ true I didn’t. It’s nice not to be blamed for a change.

    • mona
      March 13, 2015 at 12:26 pm

      And just a bit futher up the water are a more than a billion Chinese who may find Aussie quite an attractive place to put their suplus millions, how would you stop them?. They can be quite ruthless.

      • March 13, 2015 at 1:06 pm

        That’s been Australia’s lot for near 200 years, the Yellow Peril. and in Russia, known as Vostok [The East]. Constant fear of invasion.

Comments are closed.