Maybe It’s Not The Human Rights Act We Need To Ditch…

…maybe it’s the morons like Mr Justice Collins who adjudicate on it:

A terror suspect last night won a human rights case to have his tag removed – because he thinks MI5 has put a bomb inside it.

A judge said the dangerous preacher of hate has mental health problems, and wearing the electronic monitoring device was making him ‘delusional’.

He ruled this amounted to a breach of Article 3 of the Human Rights Act, which is meant to prohibit torture.

As a result, the Somalian-born fanatic will be free to walk the streets untagged despite still being rated a grave threat to the public.

You couldn’t make it up, could you?

The judge also lifted a ban on the imam’s children having an iPad or laptop – intended to stop him poisoning minds on the internet – because it was stopping them from making friends as well as affecting their education.

So children couldn’t make friends or have an education before April 3rd, 2010?

12 comments for “Maybe It’s Not The Human Rights Act We Need To Ditch…

  1. woodsy42
    June 21, 2015 at 10:28 am

    The should have assured him that it did indeed have a bomb in it, and it would be detonated if he strayed from his restrictions. Atually that could be a good idea to apply generally.

  2. DICK R
    June 21, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Let us all hope that Mr Justice Collin’s wife does not fall victim to a terrorist outrage when out shopping.

    • Mazz
      June 21, 2015 at 1:36 pm

      Very ironic if HE does. Can’t stop laughing at the thought – hahahahaha, stupid bastrd!

  3. wiggia
    June 21, 2015 at 11:18 am

    A terror suspect with mental health problems, shouldn’t he be in a secure mental institution ?

    • Mazz
      June 21, 2015 at 1:38 pm

      A Judge with mental health problems, shouldn’t he be in a secure mental institution ?

  4. Old Geezer
    June 21, 2015 at 1:08 pm

    I think that it is the judge who has the mental health problem.

    • Mazz
      June 21, 2015 at 1:38 pm

      Sorry, Old Geezer, you beat me to it!

  5. Hereward unbowed.
    June 21, 2015 at 3:03 pm

    Yuman rites will be the death of us, the HRA again dumps on common sense and therein British jurisprudence.

    Yeah a good question, who is the nutter – and just who is, the bigger threat?

    Quite clearly, this is no Justice – necessarily and urgently should he seek the attention of some celebrated head doctor.

    He surely jests with the British public who involuntarily are forced to have to pay his stipend – for sympathizing and then ruling in favour of the plaintiff is, extreme tragicomedy only someone unhinged could appreciate.

  6. June 22, 2015 at 2:31 am

    Only in Britain. Perhaps a trading partner example, Chinese say, could be considered. Instead of a tag and a bus-pass, an FMJ worn internally and the bill sent to his kids.

  7. Ed P
    June 22, 2015 at 10:57 am

    I know nothing of Mr Justice Collins and whether he has “form” with curious judgements, but perhaps he wished to make a point to highlight the absurdity of the laws to which we are now subjected?

  8. David
    June 22, 2015 at 11:00 am

    @”The should have assured him that it did indeed have a bomb in it, and it would be detonated if he strayed from his restrictions. Atually that could be a good idea to apply generally.”
    It should of course been a real bomb.

  9. Viscount Rectum
    June 23, 2015 at 9:13 am

    The easiest people to fool are psychiatrists, ask Lord Jenner?,its a human right? to tell any made up bullshit to benefit oneself, shrinks will listen to any fairy tale and it will make money down the line, fat fees anyone?

Comments are closed.