Who’s behind these movements? [2]

This follows on from the look at the common elements with the major world movements over the past century and a half.

The question is simple:

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/10/the-mystery-of-isis-toyota-army-solved.html

The US Treasury has recently opened an inquiry about the so-called “Islamic State’s” (ISIS/ISIL) use of large numbers of brand-new Toyota trucks. The issue has arisen in the wake of Russia’s air operations over Syria and growing global suspicion that the US itself has played a key role in arming, funding, and intentionally perpetuating the terrorist army across Syria and Iraq.

What would you have said? The Saudis, no?

ABC News in their article, “US Officials Ask How ISIS Got So Many Toyota Trucks,” reports:

U.S. counter-terror officials have asked Toyota, the world’s second largest auto maker, to help them determine how ISIS has managed to acquire the large number of Toyota pick-up trucks and SUVs seen prominently in the terror group’s propaganda videos in Iraq, Syria and Libya, ABC News has learned.

Toyota says it does not know how ISIS obtained the vehicles and is “supporting” the inquiry led by the Terror Financing unit of the Treasury Department — part of a broad U.S. effort to prevent Western-made goods from ending up in the hands of the terror group.

“This is a question we’ve been asking our neighbors,” Faily said. “How could these brand new trucks… these four wheel drives, hundreds of them — where are they coming from?”

Not surprisingly, it appears the US Treasury is asking the wrong party. Instead of Toyota, the US Treasury’s inquiry should have started next door at the US State Department.

And:

The British government has also admittedly supplied a number of vehicles to terrorists fighting inside of Syria. The British Independent’s 2013 article titled, “Revealed: What the West has given Syria’s rebels,” reported that:

So far the UK has sent around £8m of “non-lethal” aid, according to official papers seen by The Independent, comprising five 4×4 vehicles with ballistic protection; 20 sets of body armour; four trucks (three 25 tonne, one 20 tonne); six 4×4 SUVs; five non-armoured pick-ups; one recovery vehicle; four fork-lifts; three advanced “resilience kits” for region hubs, designed to rescue people in emergencies; 130 solar powered batteries; around 400 radios; water purification and rubbish collection kits; laptops; VSATs (small satellite systems for data communications) and printers.

Now, if you come upon that bit of information cold, you might say – naughty government or hopelessly inept government.  You might say that.

But in the light of part one of this post and what that was based on from Sunday evening at my place, then a different picture emerges of far from ineptitude.  At least it relies on ineptitude from the players at the point of incident but the people who sent the items up the line knew full well what was going to happen.

Reason – it all happened before in previous theatres.

And it is repeated in the tracking of the 911 terrorists and then the sudden failure of security on the morning, reprised on 7/7 with the sudden failing of security procedures.

To put this analogously, you want to wipe out a school.  You don’t need to go in and kill them, all you need to do is arm four or five kids to the teeth and ensure the intercom fails that day.  Nature does the rest.  One of the “modern” mothers wants to kill her child because it prevents her partying?  Simple, leave knives and electrical equipment about in the kitchen and the child locked in there.

Equipping Syrian rebels and then strafing them on behalf of Assad?  Who’s tugging whose here?

On the surface, it looks a simple case of getting the Muslims killing each other, therefore unable to effectively kill off Israel.  But what of the mass movement of migrants to Europe?  Was that foreseen or was it not at all foreseen?

I don’t believe for one second that Merkel could not have seen this coming.  She knew full well and her brief, from her Bertelsmann masters, was to get the maximum internal conflagration going. It’s not hard to discern why if you go back to other theatres.  You can’t take this paragraph in isolation. It must be put with the previous post and all your other reading.

Coming back to the Toyotas. Treasury did not know what State Department was up to?  That’s a study in itself.  State Department says Dulles Bros, McNamara and many others – all One-Worlders.

H/T Wiggia. Further from Wiggia:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/asylum-shelters-in-germany-struggle-with-refugee-violence-a-1056393.html

None of these “incidents” are ever in the MSM.

2 comments for “Who’s behind these movements? [2]

  1. XTC
    October 12, 2015 at 1:19 pm

    On the one hand there’s the “we have brilliant leaders who (when things are secret) manage to execute magnificent Machiavellian plots, yet (when things are open) the same people curiously fuck up”

    On the other.. “to any action, there are unforeseen consequences which idiot leaders don’t (or can’t) think through, partly because they focus on short term goals”.

  2. Old Geezer
    October 12, 2015 at 2:33 pm

    How many times when the IRA struck in mainland UK, did we hear that the security cameras were not working that day. Nothing new here folks.

Comments are closed.