Why are Left-liberals such spoilsports?

Festive cheer at the pumps as oil price hits an 11-year low

At a time when such goodwill is about, one needs to stop and think why the Left wants, instead, such misery for everyone.

How can they support their beloved ISIS, Hamas and Hezbollah – they clearly do because they overwhelmingly voted in Corbyn who is for those things, they want to ban everything by supporting their beloved EU:

EU wants teenagers to stop using social media

And those fruitcakes on US campuses wanting to physically attack anyone with a different opinion to them.

What is wrong with the left-liberal mind, why are they such fascists with all their hate speech – this phobic, that phobic, wanting open borders, wanting to destroy things like Christmas. Ain’t gonna be no Christmas lights and pantomimes under your beloved Sharia, Left people.

Ain’t gonna be no joy any more for anyone. Jackboot on the face forever courtesy of our Leftist friends.

They turn a blind eye to Rotherham and refuse to call it for what it is:

rotherham rapists

How can the Left turn a blind eye to this, as their Sarah champion did?  How can they kill Brazilian electricians, as their Cressida Dick did?  How can they tax us and spend on irrelevant things to the point that the Labour govt had no money left in the coffers?

How can they, in France, give votes to the French Tories to keep out those who love their country [still, after all this]?  Why do the Left hate Britain so much that they want to flood it with jihadis whose mobile phones had murders and rapes on them?

How can the Left support this:

Hundreds of migrants arriving in Norway had mobile phones containing images of executions, severed heads and dead children, police reveal 

But they do support it, pretending it is poor women and children flooding in, rather than who it actually is.

How can they vote for a criminal, Hillary Clinton, when she should be in jail for her crimes?  But the Left-liberal does support her.

How can a Left-liberal do this to her child:

left childJPG

… transgendering tots, getting five year olds to be homosexual, carrying on with all this c***?

How can she turn herself into such a foulmouthed harpy that she brings down a presidential candidate?


How can a Left-liberal aid and abet the misery that feminazism has brought women, which many women have now called out?

What is wrong with the brains of these people? They see people enjoying the Christmas festivities and want them banned:

Brooklyn principal bans Christmas, Santa & Thanksgiving from school

And it is the left, not anyone else – it is pure PCism:

According to the Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) of PS 169 in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, the recently-appointed principal, Eujin Jaela Kim, has moved to rid the school of any references to such holidays, or anything that could represent a “religious system,” even though the city Department of Education does allow certain religious symbols, as well as Santa Claus.

PTA president Mimi Ferrer told the New York Post that school administrators told her that the school “definitely can’t say Christmas, nothing with Christmas on it, nothing with Santa.”

Why are Left-liberals so sick in the head?

2 comments for “Why are Left-liberals such spoilsports?

  1. Voice of Reason
    December 15, 2015 at 3:59 pm

    Just out of interest, for what should Hillary Clinton be imprisoned?

    The GOP spent $45 million trying to find something actionable against the Clintons, and the best they could arrive at was perjury.

    As for the recent email stuff, it was apparently not against the law, which might be rather a good thing for Cheney, who deleted millions of emails during the investigation of the Valerie Plame business.

    • December 15, 2015 at 4:28 pm

      We’ve been through all that, I’ve posted a dozen reasons, each which were crimes either singly or severally, these can be found all over the web. He who wishes to see can easily see, he who has no wish to see will continue to ask why, over and over.

      OK, I’ll play ball because Brits might not know what every American knows. Let’s stick to the current one which she had to have clearance on before she could even put her name forward:

      Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, Leslie Caldwell, and her Chief of the Corporate Fraud Section, Andrew Weissmann, destroyed Arthur Andersen and its 85,000 jobs on unfounded charges of obstruction of justice for destroying documents the Supreme Court said it had no legal obligation to keep.

      So she set the precedent there.

      Counter-terrrorism advisor Lisa Monaco, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, and then White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, plus Valerie Jarrett all wrote to her on Benghazi – this was to a departmental email inbox she’d taken to her own home.

      Ata minimum, she violated the Espionage Act by having information relating to the national defense on her server, unprotected by her department.

      The espionage act—which regulates the handling of intelligence by government officials — does not refer to classified information; it refers to information relating to the national defense. Moreover, it does not prohibit solely the transmission of such information; it criminalizes the communication, delivery, or transmission of that information; causing communication, delivery, or transmission of that information; permitting the removal of that information from its proper place of custody through gross negligence; permitting that information to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed through gross negligence; or, failing to make a prompt report to superiors in the government when an official knows that the information has been removed from its proper place of custody, communicated to someone not authorized to have it, lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed. See also Title 18 United States Code Section 2071 (prohibiting destruction of records).

      She then violated a direct request to turn over the records and held out, which would have had any other citizen down for “probable cause” at a minimum. Then when the server was finally handed over, it had been wiped.

      That is not only obstruction but in the light of her own conduct on Anderson, it compounds the charge.

      The false statements, on top of that, are crimes under 18 United States Code Section 1001—both by Ms. Clinton to Congress (“no classified information”) and in writing by Cheryl Mills to the State Department and just filed with Judge Sullivan—in which she states: “On matters pertaining to the conduct of government business, it was her practice to use the officials’ government email accounts.” We already know that Ms. Clinton used her personal server exclusively.

      The woman at a minimum is unfit, on that behaviour, to hold any office and yet Obama says that about Trump. why does he not say the same about Clinton?

      By any measure, these are crimes she is accused of, not just sharp practice, crimes which the DOJ, with plenty of probable cause in the light of Anderson and others, refuses to move on and does not even enquire about.

Comments are closed.