All right, applying a little logic here, as the text says:
The monastery had survived as a place of Christian worship for almost one-and-a-half millennia, predating Islam itself, and had only suffered superficial damage throughout the country’s most recent conflicts.
In all the wars and conflicts, it was not wiped out, even in the Crusades backlash, even under the Ottomans. So what has changed now, such that Palmyra and this site were razed?
Put it a different way – who are ISIS? They are American founded and funded, along with the Saudis. Much of the Muslim world has disowned them. Why? Because they deviate from the way the rest of the Muslims, themselves given to throat-slitting, body part chopping and domestic rape, go about it.
The rest of this post after this Sultan Knish quote appears to contradict the quote. Appears to. Actually, it adds to it. It accepts all that the good Sultan says – and since 2010, I too have been calling for the British mosques to be dismantled and since now for mosques to be officially razed – but Islam is not the ONLY game going on out there.
First though – Islam:
ISIS is at the extreme end of the scale, not because it tortures, kills and rapes, but because it implemented the Caliphate immediately. The atrocities for which ISIS has become known are typical of a functioning Caliphate. The execution of Muslims who do not submit to the Caliph, the ethnic cleansing and sexual slavery of non-Muslims are not aberrations. They are normal behavior for a Caliphate.
The last Caliphate, the Ottoman Empire, was selling non-Muslim girls as sex slaves after the invention of the telephone. A New York Times report from 1886 documented the sale of girls as young as twelve, one of them with “light hazel eyes, black eyebrows and long yellow hair”.
An earlier report from the London Post described Turks, “sending their blacks to market, in order to make room for a newly-purchased white girl”. This behavior is not a temporary aberration, but dates back to Mohammed’s men raping and enslaving non-Muslim women and young girls as a reward for fighting to spread Islam.
Yes, very much so.
But if you trace ISIS, the CIA also pops up and where they pop up, so do the evil muvvers behind the US leadership, whichever nominal one it is at the time. And their aim has always been:
1) Abolition of all ordered governments
2) Abolition of private property
3) Abolition of inheritance
4) Abolition of patriotism
5) Abolition of the family
6) Abolition of religion
7) Creation of a world government
There is nothing in the UN programme, that of the EU and within the US among the PTB, militating against those aims. Nothing with the Bilderbergers to contradict those platform planks.
They mention religion but there is one religion only which is attacked with barbaric savagery. Certainly they want the Jews wiped out as a people but as for religions, there is one enemy for these PTB and the war is constant, unrelenting – in schools, in law, in film and music, in politics.
And this is different to the rest of the Muslim world, whose ire is mainly for the Jew.
I’ll not run the picture here of the Christian girl mutilated and left with a cross driven through her mouth. Those little touches are the same we saw with the Janjaweed in Darfur, also in Rwanda and the people from the west who appeared in both cases, just before it turned bestial, as well as in Kosovo when it turned really nasty, also in the Ukraine when it turned from a demarcation dispute to savagery, such as the burning of those who sought asylum in the trades union building and I believe the bringing down of that plane – these people like to euphemize it as psy-ops, otherwise known to ordinary mortals as terrorizing the locals.
One feature of the Maidan massacre in Kiev was that the gunmen fired at both sides. Why? Under whose influence was that order given to those snipers? Clearly someone wanting a general conflagration, trouble on Putin’s doorstep. Until then, there had just been the usual tug of war between Moscow and Kiev.
These are exceedingly nasty people, which can be seen in the savagery and bestiality of the Belgian child murders, sheeted home to various members of royalty, businessmen and local officials. It’s these added touches which give away the hand of the western PTB, the ones who control elections. I hesitate to call it Masonic influence, more that some of those are members of various organizations. It’s not the organizations, it’s the people in them, leading them.
And to get an idea of their continuity, go back to 1783 and all subsequent major European upheavals not specifically state-on-state.
All … official organs, the press, schools, seminaries, cathedral chapters (hence, too, all appointments to sees, pulpits, and chairs) were to be brought as far as possible under the influence of the organization, and princes themselves were to be surrounded by a legion of enlightened men, in order not only to disarm their opposition, but also to compel their energetic co-operation.
A complete transformation would thus be effected; public opinion would be controlled; “priests and princes” would find their hands tied; the marplots who ventured to interfere would repent their temerity; and the order would become an object of dread to all its enemies.
I’ve been saying now since about 2003 that there are three antagonists at all times – there is the local population of a nation, there is the visible enemy, e.g. Islam in Europe now, which rises for some time and there is Them, always there is Them. That visible enemy is very much an enemy for the time, quite murderous but the conflict eventually fades away.
Them move onto the next project.
In WWII, there was the visible Hun, there was us and then there was Them, in the form of funding of both sides. In the 1880s, there was Capital, there was Labour and there was Them, exploiting and heightening the divisions, funding both sides. Later, Trotsky was funded by Them to the tune of some $10,000. Explore Jacob Schiff.
The current bete noire is the left – Corbyn & the other nutters, us and as always – Them:
It has ever been this way. Why has no one sent in some A-10 warthogs to take out some major mosques in retaliation? Sure the Muslims then hit back with the “Holy” War, the mother of all wars, millions die, they lose, peace resumes, Them look for the next division to exploit and finance.
Answer is that the Muslims are useful for now.