You’ve possibly seen all these:
Tale of a young thing in Germany, obviously not elected for her brainpower:
Federal Minister of Family Affairs, Manuela Schwesig, a member of the centre-left Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), wants to increase the funding for a specific program called “Living Democracy – Active against right violence and enmity”.
It is described on its website as a program to encourage diversity and democratic coexistence. The program, scheduled to last from 2015 to 2019, works with regional and local governments and schools to educate children and adults about right wing ideas and how to stop them.
How to tell if right-wing people are leasing space in your restaurant to “Living and Working in the Migration society” which is designed to make Germans recognise that their country will be housing migrants for the foreseeable future and that they must learn to adapt to it.
Not so much coming out of her mind as out of the minds of those controlling her, yet she fully embraces it. Democratic coexistence – we invite in a million jihadis whose express intent is rape the women and take over the country and so locals must be “educated” to happily accept that.
Let’s pause for one moment and look at the definition in the quote: centre-left. The words centre-left and social-democrat are generally taken to mean moderates but I put to you that these four, and in particular the filly in the pic, is anything but moderate. She is advocating ruining businesses run by people disagreeing and suppressing thought which is even labelled “right”. She’s advocating brainwashing children specifically against those she labels “right” and suppressing those views.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is not moderate – that is extremist. As for myself, an avowed “centre-rightist”, am I advocating her banning or prosecution for her beliefs? No, I’m advocating her being voted out by citizens of that country who see the extremist quisling she is.
Different other thing. I’m advocating the rule of law and of justice not based on an indigenous person’s beliefs, not unlike with the Founding Fathers of the U.S.A.
Therefore, on the left-right line, starting hard left with communists and working our way to the right, we need to reach the centre before bansturbation and other extreme views are abandoned. Then we move through the bourgeois, centre-right zone where most readers of this blog and I are found, then we approach the BNP and start getting extreme again. This is also where religious theocrats are found.
Therefore, there is only one section of society [possibly 30% of all adults?] safe enough to entrust the oversight of the organs of society to, all others would cause conflagration and disorder of some kind.
You would find such overseers just as concerned with protecting the rights of minorities as any purported “diversity” of the violent left, the difference being that there would not be one law for one and one for others – there’d be One Law. Full stop. Period. You do see the difference?
And if “centre-left” means the things that filly means, then this also includes Cameron, Osborne and Clarke, Heseltine, Heath, Major. A “centre-rightist” would be Philip Davies or Douglas Carswell. Nigel would be a bit to the right of them, advocating border controls as Australia does. Stil lwithin the rule of law, using verbal advocacy and not bansturbation.
Think it’s important to get all our public personae in perspective.
This woman, Green Party leader Anton Hofreiter wants to see more legal cases being brought against anyone deemed to be “xenophobic” agitators.
“We can’t have no-go areas in Germany, and no one should be made to feel inhuman by threats or attacks,” he told German paper Neue Osnabrueker Zeitung.
He was party to the no-go areas being created by jihadis – rape areas and so those who oppose these no-go areas are to be charged. Why? Because he wants no no-go areas.
Ms. Wallström restated the importance of Sweden pursuing what she called a “feminist security policy”
What’s that when it’s at home? Surely she was appointed to represent the interests of ALL people, not just her feminist socialist cronies … or have I got this principle completely wrong?
The French President has spoken about the possibility of member states being suspended or expelled from the European Union (EU) if ‘right-wing’ governments come to power.
The threat to kick out EU member states who offend certain rules was made by socialist President Francois Hollande during a France Inter radio interview, reports Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten. He said a country can be “suspended” from the EU as “Europe has legal tools, through articles in treaties, to prevent a country from violating democratic principles.”
Violating democratic principles? A man trying to shut down online dissent in his country as we speak, part of an unelected EU, wanting to expel democratically elected governments with views different to his communist ideas, which are undemocratic.
Who is the group in society with the least logical minds? I know you’re tempted to say women but hold on. It’s children, is it not? Young children have not developed the faculty of logic much beyond native cunning and thus they are educated at home and school, as has been from the year dot.
The four people above show similar logic but they’ve been put in charge of things, they can blight people’s lives with the stroke of a pen. We’ve all seen those films where some child is given unbelievable powers, for example the Doctor Who episode with Tennant and Piper where the little girl draws pictures to “disappear” those she doesn’t like.
The terrifying thing for any rational adult is that these people have this power and are so gone, mentally, that they cannot be reasoned with. Yuri Bezmenov on such people in America:
… half-baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern.
You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black. You cannot change the basic perception and illogical behavior. In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible …
Such people are not just German foreign ministers, they are the ordinary voter who will decide on June 13th, on those principles and using that sort of logic, to remain in the EU. They are people perfectly happy to snuff out any dissent, on pain of legal penalty, they want anyone not thinking their way banned from speaking.
I’m not suggesting in any way that they should be dealt with as society has dealt with quislings and “collaborators horizontales” every time liberation finally comes:
… because that would make the liberating forces just as bestial as the Nazis and socialists, as the PCists and all the bansturbators. Extremists such as the four pictured in this post, from Schwesig to Hollande, must not be summarily dispatched by further extremism on our part.
There is such a thing as civilized society, which extremists such as Schwesig and Hollande patently fail to understand. No, it’s a case of waiting until the war is won and then prosecuting, not through star chambers and kangaroo courts but through the judicial system we are now defending, in the sovereign nation’s system we are now defending.
After due process, with counsel of quality defending them, if then found guilty and the appeals rejected – and that is by no means certain – then they can be executed. The alternative, for those who oppose capital punishment, is for these people to be incarcerated in perpetuity, with pictures on their cell walls of every woman and girl raped by a jihadi staring down on them.
[Thanks to Breitbart for the four quotes used.]