Gulp – not even I would dare put it like this [quote below], mainly because there are plenty of good wimmin hidden away [the few females in my own wider circle are fine lasses all] but these ones in this post always appear in and dominate social media these days, to the exclusion of the good.
It’s not unlike the Muslim invaders – it’s clearly the jihadis we are down on, the Imams, the MCB and everyone organizing it who is non-Muslim, meaning Them. Ditto with the blacks – always young males for the violent stuff and black females for the gauche, e.g. their “music”. Grandparents don’t seem to feature in it all that much.
And with wimmin, it’s the SJWs and parachutees who are the problem. Thus this sort of attitude from the unenamoured male, in reaction:
In fact, feminism today is just that, lonely unattached females looking for a purpose to their lives. Instead of snagging a husband and having kids, they kit themselves out like extras from the freak show and scream at men for not loving them. Instead of tending to children, they talk endlessly about their unused female parts.
Much of what is going wrong in the West is some version of what we are seeing with the endless hashtag campaigns run by women. The female of our species has a biological purpose. That’s to find a suitable mate, bear children and raise them to sexual maturity. That’s nature’s assignment to women. Anything else is either in support of that purpose, frivolous or in opposition to biological necessity.
My question is this – what are these air-breathers actually creating? What’s their value to anyone? What are they producing for the future of either their families or society as a whole? Even paying taxes would be something.
No one appears to be telling them this.
And I don’t want them going off having families for fear of what monsters the little darlings will become. Most of us can put up with them in a protest we don’t need to watch – let them have their useless youth, I say but it changes when they cross that line to harm the general public e.g. threatening with violence those who disagree with them.
For example, the black female student on vid some days back attacking a boy with dreadlocks for “cultural appropriation”, taking down statues at universities, preventing people from speaking and so on.
My question is not so much about these wastes of space but about who’s inventing this c*** like “cultural appropriation”, “micro-aggression” etc.? Just as Voltaire had much to answer for in the French Revolution, spiking people’s hatreds, who actually is it inventing all these weasel expressions for the mindless to fling at us, the wider community?