Winston Smith, face the camera!

I do not normally endorse or promote commercial enterprise. But I would wish to commend Amazon Prime for their video production series entitled ‘The Man in the High Castle’. Without detailing too much of the plot-lines, the series is based around a Philip K Dick novel which described a modern-day world where America lost the war, and the German Reich rules over Eastern America, with the Western States under the iron fist of Japan.

I will not publish spoilers, but instead would focus on two areas of life under the depicted Nazi rule: one is surveillance, the other is of the Nazi ideology regarding family life.

The heroine, escaping from the Resistance who believe she is a deadly threat, claims asylum in German-dominated New York, and is housed in a womens’ dormitory/ apartment complex. Every area of the flat is covered by CCTV, and she is also recorded speaking with a troubled young man in the apartment corridor; and that conversation detected and is shown to the youngster’s father; who is head of the Nazi leadership in America.

The wife of the Head of the State Broadcasting  believe she is a failure as a Nazi wife because, once again, she receives definite proof of her inability to conceive a child; and is fearful that she will be replaced with a younger, and presumably more fertile model.

In the world as depicted by ‘The High Castle’, there are still no computers, but the Nazis still manage a fair representation of the total Police State in their absence. Surveillance by both the Japanese Kempeitai, and the Nazi Gestapo is overwhelming, and their actions and interrogations are as in reality, back in the real 1940’s.

 

The reason for this particular essay is quite simple; the Government’s new Digital Economy Bill is returning for Report and Committee stages, and the Guvminnt’s ideas about how your data is stored, shared and used is truly spectacular.

What you are most likely to have missed is the bit about Digital Government. The part which will personally impact you more than anything else; the part about how the state wants to take control of your personal information and share it without your consent, knowledge or right to amend.

Any piece of personal information you are asked to hand over to the state – and it is a lot more than you realise – will be subject to broad sharing capabilities. Not only will it be passed around government, but it will be shared on request with local councils, quangos, statistical authorities, charities and businesses.

Yes business. Initially, gas and electricity companies. But despite promises, it is entirely conceivable that private health providers, credit reference agencies and insurance companies will be lined up further down the line as those “specified persons” with permission to access and make decisions about your personal information.

The Bill’s intention is to create better data sharing gateways. The plans to digitise our birth, death, marriage and civil partnership certificates – which will be stored and shared in bulk – will make the sharing of our personal information as easy as clicking a mouse.  There will be no requirement for them to consult you. You won’t be asked in advance, you won’t even be told after the event and you won’t have the chance to opt out.

Worried?  You should be. Do you remember the ID card furore before the 2010 general election?  The scheme was axed at great expense when public support for the plans plummeted after it was revealed that HMRC had lost personal information belonging to 25 million child benefit claimants.

Only then did the reality of how insecure our data is sink in. It’s worth noting the lost information still hasn’t been recovered almost 10 years later.

Don’t be fooled that things have improved. In 2014/15 government departments experienced almost 9,000 data breaches, according to a recent National Audit Office report.

 

Read the Big Brother pages, and then contact your MP, the person who is supposed to represent YOU, and tell them what you think of this disgraceful piece of legislation!

1 comment for “Winston Smith, face the camera!

  1. Errol
    January 17, 2017 at 5:38 pm

    The bill has come about precisely because writing to your MP is pointless.

    In a democracy this bill simply wouldn’t have been conceived. As soon as they wanted to make it law, we, the people; would reject it outright. They might keep trying but we would keep rejecting.

    However, the supposed reason for it is to – as it always is – to combat terrorism. Of course, the reality is that’s the excuse. The situation of dangerous muslim fanatics roaming around would never have come about if – again; ew lived in a democray where such malicious characters could be prevented from opening the flood gates to all they wanted to import.

    We’re betrayed by a government that has, behind it an oppressive, malicious, sadly utterly incompetent state.

    Heck, as it is government cannot link a birth to tax credits. It’s record on security is atrocious as it has no reason to value the data. It’s just other people to them. What are the penalties for abuse? What safeguards are in place to prevent any old soap from wanting to know if the owner of the house they want to buy has changed his boiler? Officials cannot be trusted and should not be. You can guarantee there will be no audit log kept of access.

    It is, like all statist totalitarian oppression, a desperate move to control everyone.

Comments are closed.