Directionless march of vulgarity which turned ordinary people right off

I notice Julia has a post ready to go, which will end four in a row from me.

53 percent of women

What we had yesterday was a demonstration, months in the planning – it was not spontaneous – it was the global, well-funded machine at work and it failed to address any real issues women still face in the world, from rapes to this:

real women's march

And of course, with no Hillary to celebrate, they had to find another cause – so they made it vaguely about women’s rights. Sounded good. What they did not count on was that it would become a showcase for lack of focus, vulgarity – the filth spewing from Madonna’s and that Judd’s mouths.

These were the most undignified and violent people [including the previous day’s offerings], representing maybe 48% of the population who have absolutely no idea how to behave. People who’ve let themselves sink to being demoralized flotsam – heaven help their offspring.

kass wm

Frankly, the men were violent and the women were harpies. Compare that to a Trump crowd:

Notice any difference in tone, in the quality of the people? If I now leave you with what was going on on Twitter last night – the hundreds of women tweeting just as this one did below, then it does demonstrate, as Michelle Malkin, one of those women, said: “This shows the huge rift between people in America – there are two Americas.”

And one lady in the Mail this morning had written that this march in London had zero to do with British matters, and if it was solidarity, then what was it in aid of?

missed trump

In fact, it was for nothing and not only that, it was counterproductive, with most people nauseated by the harpies and the violent.

8 comments for “Directionless march of vulgarity which turned ordinary people right off

  1. January 22, 2017 at 8:07 am

    James Wilson at my place wrote:

    Irony never strikes them even as it is women who raise the men who are the object of their disappointment. More than ever.

    I look at it more forcefully. I think we can say that men of our vintage have a certain strength of character and women know they are always protected – they need only sound the chivalrous alarm and some man will jump in to assist.

    In fact, it ennobles the beast so to speak – we act better, we pull in our paunches, we act with decency, we take care of our hygiene. But there is one key criterion for this – we do this for women who clearly like men. Liking begets liking and if a woman is keen on us, then we are keen on her – it’s so, so simple.

    This yesterday – sigh. Piers Morgan got it wrong when he was calling for a men’s march to protest about things which have happened to the male.

    Nah, that’s not manly. Manly is to look at Madonna’s and Judd’s guff and one-on-one, to be civil to them but that’s it – they get nothing else – zero, zilch, nada. They have blown it [and in Madonna’s case, that was not meant to be a pun].

    On the blogs, we eviscerate them. In RL, we ignore them and even grin. They have no cooperation from us men whatever. However, every woman who tore into those people yesterday – we men are on call for those women. Should they click their fingers, we come. Willingly.

    That’s how it works. The ones yesterday – no brains. Our own ladies – intelligent gals, knowing how to play it right.

  2. mona
    January 22, 2017 at 9:16 am

    It was was more to do with boredom, the need to get out more and it wasn’t snowing. the cause? more sex?..who cares.

    • January 29, 2017 at 7:32 am

      If it had been cold and wet, you’d have seen a tinier march, that’s for sure!

  3. The Stigler
    January 22, 2017 at 11:38 am

    It’s not even the 48% or whatever. There’s plenty of good, hard-working people who prefer Hilary to Trump. I would have favoured her, but here we are. That’s democracy.

    This is a couple of percent of hardcore Guardianista babies who just can’t stand the result. People who at every moment expect everyone else to bend to their will, and defend that in the name of democracy, but when the worm turns, can’t stand it.

    • January 29, 2017 at 7:33 am

      The trouble is, that hardcore seems to be able to march at the drop of a hat. Opposing people are too busy working!

  4. Graham Wood
    January 22, 2017 at 12:41 pm

    Slightly off topic (but only slightly), many of the women may have been disillusioned “warmists” who noticed that within HOURS the official guv’mnt website had actually removed references to that world-wide scourge known as AGW .
    That must be a record and the only known instance of a newly elected USA President committing a “hate crime” in his inauguration speech before the watching world. What gall!
    Trouble is – who will arrest him? Not the NYPD or anyone else as he is Commander in Chief?
    But it will not be forgotten and will be on record as a hate crime “incident”. Cor!

    • January 29, 2017 at 7:34 am

      The WH web always changes when a new President is sworn in.

  5. January 22, 2017 at 12:51 pm

    Right.

Comments are closed.