Sanctuary: Safe for 37 days, then escorted abroad…..

I wrote in July of the tragic and totally-avoidable and unnecessary death of Kate Steinle, shot by an illegal alien from Mexico, whose love affair with America, California, and in particular  San Francisco; and its easy cash, easy laws and supine State’s administration towards illegal aliens made it a demi-paradise for this low-life from below the border.

The Sacramento Bee is covering the murder trial and is mysteriously, or rather not so mysteriously, bang on the side of; not the victim, cut down with only her last words to her father,”Help me, Dad!” which now echo every day in that tormented man’s mind. No, its feelings, those of the Editorial Board anyway, are firmly linked to the murderous Mexican;  Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, a.k.a. Jose Ines Garcia Zarate and the ruthless manner in which he was treated.

The Bee reckons that San Francisco’s Sanctuary City status, whereby this illegal felon, having served time, was being processed for his sixth deportation, was correct; when the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department dropped a warrant on a drugs charge, and he was instead released into the care of the SFSD. The San Francisco court dismissed the drug charge and the SFSD declined to honour the detainer from the Immigration Authorities; because of the ‘Sanctuary’ policy of the City — choosing instead to release Lopez-Sanchez on April 15. The illegal alien disappears, being street smart, and only surfaces after having ‘found’ a Sig Sauer .40 calibre weapon, that gun having been stolen from a Land Management Ranger’s car. The Sig was discharged, the heavy bullet hit Kate in the back, piercing her heart, and death was just a matter of seconds.

But the Bee reckons it wasn’t Garcia-Lopez’ fault, it wasn’t the lunatic ‘sanctuary’ policy of the smug City of San Francisco, it wasn’t even the Frisco Sheriff who declined to hold this loser for four hours until the Immigration people slapped cuffs on him again; The Bee then opines that Garcia-Lopez must have been mentally-disturbed, and didn’t get any back-up after being released. Hells Gates, for the Bee’ the only person or outfit which hasn’t been exonerated is Kate herself!

Kate’s estate has filed a federal lawsuit against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, San Francisco County’s former sheriff, the Federal Bureau of Land Management and the man who allegedly fired the deadly shot. Kate’s Law is stymied in the Senate, waiting for a majority.

But the Bee still says, ‘Wait for the trial: innocent until proven guilty!’ Fair enough, but when the ‘guilty’ verdict comes down, will the Bee accept that Kate would still be alive if the bloody Sheriff hadn’t cut the Mexican felon loose, and ignored the ultra-liberal Frisco Sanctuary rules; just for once?

4 comments for “Sanctuary: Safe for 37 days, then escorted abroad…..

  1. Hereward Unbowed.
    October 25, 2017 at 12:27 am

    “Sig Sauer .40 calibre weapon”

    And “stolen from a Land Management Ranger’s car”

    For a start, they should jail that lackadaisical tosser.

    “No, its feelings, those of the Editorial Board anyway, are firmly linked to the murderous Mexican; Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, a.k.a. Jose Ines Garcia Zarate and the ruthless manner in which he was treated.”

    and I muse, the daily [ever so busy] Bees what would be their feelings on Charles Manson, was he just a misunderstood hippie?

    R.I.P. Kate.

  2. Jason
    October 25, 2017 at 3:57 am

    The San Francisco Sanctuary City Law implemented by Kamala Harris, who later went to Sacramento and is now in the US Congress, fast rising star of the extreme liberal left, has the end result that Moonbeam Jerry Brown has signed Sanctuary State status over the entire state of California – and that means nobody must heed the needs of ICE to enforce immigration laws against people in the US without legal standing to be here in the first place.

    Thus, for poor Kate Steinle’s accused murderer in San Francisco, in accordance with the laws DEMANDING Sanctuary City and Sanctuary State law be followed, to a tee, I would fully imagine possible that:

    – The court bailiff will have no legal responsibility to make sure the suspect is kept under tight security inside and outside the courtroom.

    – The jail keeper charged with keeping suspects in custody awaiting outcome of a trial will have no legal responsibility to interfere with the suspect’s Sanctuary Rights by keeping the jail cell door locked at any time nor guard over it.

    – The police called out to chase after the suspect escapes the holding cell by walking out the front door and running down the street will have no legal responsibility to give chase after him.

    – The judge on the bench will have no legal responsibility to upend the suspects special Sanctuary Rights by doing anything other than dismissing all charges.

    And all over San Francisco, the happy liberal denizens in their politically correct Sanctuary City and Californians in their politically correct Sanctuary State will see absolutely nothing wrong with that scenario unfolding – especially if it vexes anyone with common sense and moral decency, which in California and San Francisco in particular, means very few if any are left.

    Someone innocent dies, young, needlessly, by murder and someone who did it will get away with murder – just to placate the Religion of Sanctuary City and now Sanctuary State.

    Yep, makes good sense to me too.

  3. October 25, 2017 at 5:48 am

    This misplaced sympathy for the perpetrator is the signature for these times today.

  4. Ed P
    October 25, 2017 at 7:08 am

    It could be Sanctuary-under-the-sea soon, as a really big tectonic shift is overdue, with the worst fault line running across the bay area. Bye bye Libtards.

Comments are closed.