Its not theft if you really need it!

You are the ‘hands-on’ management of a nationwide American retailer. You are given statistics proving that the most stolen/ pinched/ thieved/ shoplifted items across the store, and indeed across a fair proportion of the stores nationwide; are hair-care products and other items popular with; and aimed almost exclusively at: the African-American section of the customers entering your stores.

So, you take steps, on an individual store basis, across all items which are the targets of this larcenous behaviour, and place them behind locked glass doors.

A black woman claims that this is ‘racist’ behaviour on the part of the store, and goes to court to force the retailer to remove the lockable-glass doors, and allow everyone access to the products, as was before the lock-down policy was employed.

Ignore, if you will, the sheer lunacy of a customer attempting to enforce the removal of a very successful anti-shoplifting policy, and discuss the options available to the retailer.

Does Walmart

  • a) stick with the lock-away policy, and just repeat, ‘The items are no longer being stolen, now that they are unavailable to the casual removal by prospective thieves’?: or
  • b) Bow down before the great goddess which is Black-Ruled-America, place the tantalising gear back on the shelves, but spray every item with RFID materials which will show if an unscanned item is allowed past the checkouts, and incidentally increase the price of all this ephemera to cover the cost of the technology?; or
  • c) Remove all the dross which is being stolen from the shelves,; stop stocking the items altogether, and let someone else take the heat and the resultant losses?

9 comments for “Its not theft if you really need it!

  1. Lord T
    January 29, 2018 at 10:56 am

    It’s not everyday that someone has the balls to imply that they want security removed so they can steal things because security is racist.

    • January 30, 2018 at 7:56 am

      It’s inevitable. We didn’t stamp down hard enough on the first scam artists to come calling, now they all beat a path to our door…

  2. John in cheshire
    January 29, 2018 at 12:50 pm

    If I was Walmart I’d try all three options to find which works best; and it might be a different option for each store.

  3. Ed P
    January 29, 2018 at 3:31 pm

    The problem with (b) is that the security staff near the checkouts would need to be armed (& probably tripled).

  4. Mudplugger
    January 29, 2018 at 3:32 pm

    I’d attach a taser-tag which, if not officially removed at a checkout, would deliver 50,000 volts at the shop-door to anyone within one foot of it.
    That’ll make their hair curl even more than Mother Nature managed.

  5. Voice of Reason
    January 29, 2018 at 7:20 pm

    At a very rich and exclusive college near me: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443005/gibsons-bakery-oberlin-college-crusades-against-local-business

    The bakery is now suing the college for libel.

    • January 30, 2018 at 7:57 am

      Only lawyers will win.

  6. Pcar
    January 29, 2018 at 11:20 pm

    Answer:

    “c) Remove all the dross which is being stolen from the shelves,; stop stocking the items altogether, and let someone else take the heat and the resultant losses?”

    Why? Costs
    a) may be declared illegal by sjw judge – legal costs
    b) increased staff & equipment costs

    Do I win the prize?

  7. Monty
    January 30, 2018 at 1:40 am

    The bullet-proof screens that protect shopkeepers and staff from attack by criminals, are also being denounced as racist by a black politician who wants them outlawed.

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/crime/beer-delis-plexiglass-windows-council-bill-20171130.html

Comments are closed.