Forgive me for coming back to a serious topic today but two comments by FoS had me thinking:
As far as your diagnosis of the culture clash goes I am pretty much in agreement with you. But what is the cure?
‘Expunge’? What does that mean? How would you do that?
Or more accurately, how are you going to do that without reloading 1930s Europe? You may not want to send people to death camps, but you will still have to do a lot of house raiding, rounding up and deportation. Chaps in leather overcoats will be interrogating that nice Mr Khan at the cornershop in order to decide whether to ship him, his wife and kids off somewhere.
The worst aspect of mass immigration is that it cannot be wound back in any civilised way. I see the problem, but I am still waiting for someone to outline an acceptable, non-Teutonic solution.
The Enlightenment never foresaw the situation that has been created in Europe by the mass immigration of people who have no idea of the Enlightenment. It is impossible for those who care about Enlightenment ideals (yes, I know, broad brush stuff) to respond to this problem in an enlightened way.
People who believe in democracy have also had the wind knocked out of their sails. No democracy will ever have the will to solve this problem.
The Austrian writer Stefan Zweig – a fanatical pacifist – killed himself in 1942. In my opinion it was ultimately because he had no solution to the fate of Europe that was reconcilable with his beliefs.
Although not at that stage (yet), I think a lot of people like me are completely baffled: Enlightenment thought is no help at all to us. We despise what is happening, but can do nothing about it. Oy Vey!
And of course, it is designed this way. Whether Distant Relative is onto something at the link below or not, it does raise the spectre of fakery in all the major events which have slaughtered humans and reduced them to misery in the past 100 or so years:
This for Mr H who I know is a fellow fan of the misty Ms Christie.
Whilst listening to one of her books on a recent long journey the thought crossed my mind whether she was a spook. Left it in the outer regions of the old noddle until yesterday when I came across this http://mileswmathis.com/agatha.pdf Not checked out his info, but food for thought.
The bit which interested me was how many Jews were freely among Hitler’s generals and the fakery of it all – fakery is the operative word.
Svali in 2000 sounded a warning
They are truly an international group, and the group’s agenda supercedes any nationalistic feelings. There is also a lot of trading back and forth of members in these groups. A Russian trainer might come to the US for a while, complete a job, then go back, or vice-versa.
A top western financier would secretly meet with an Eastern or Russian “adversary” during those years, and have a good laugh at how the “sheep” were being deluded.
It’s not just her, there has been much information come through since then on the net, needing archiving because then it disappears, from the Fed to Obama to the paedo issue.
And how does one reader of ours who shall not be named react? He says he doesn’t “do conspiracies”. As if no one colludes, as if no one has an agenda.
Very difficult to counter such a mind – facts certainly aren’t going to do it. They would actually do it, were we to have read the same sources … but we haven’t, so no basis for communication. There’s the rub.
Compare that to Svali again:
Q: I just find it amazing that this sort of topic gets next to no press attention, considering the amount of evidence available.
A: Here is where I will sound really, really cynical. I’m not surprised, because the[ir] leadership often boast that their best protection is that no one would believe what was happening. They also have their own media blitz campaign, one that is pretty effective.
So, we have here are triple whammy:
1. The sheer jaw dropping scale of the whole thing, such that no one rational could possibly believe it is anything at all, move on please, it’s just a few fertile imaginations. The Patriot Act following 911 rang no bells, waved no red flags for anyone? Cressida Dick’s act on 7/7, the organization she’s a part of and her promotion to head cop in the UK today rang no warning bells?
What was it Orwell said? And the warnings have been everywhere online and constant, e.g.
Svali yet again:
These leaders are heads in the financial world, OLD banking money. The Rothschild family in England, and in France, have ruling seats. A descendant of the Hapsburg dynasty has a generational seat. A descendant of the ruling families of England and France have a generational seat. The Rockefeller family in the US holds a seat.
This is one reason that the[y] have been pretty “untouchable” over the years. The ruling members are very, very, very wealthy and powerful.
Q: Svali, what role does and will the UN play in the future and how do you see this unfolding? What is their timeline?
A: The UN was created early in this century in order to help overcome one of the biggest barriers to a one world government necessary, if there is to be a military rule and dictatorship by the [these people]. That barrier is the one of nationalism, or pride in one’s country. FDR was their man in America who helped the American public accept it.
These people are paedophiles, they abuse and torture small children and teach them, under duress, to become perpetrators themselves from earliest infancy. This alone means they should be stopped. They run the porn industry, along with other groups such as the Mafia, together with drug smuggling, gun running, and human slavery.
To be honest, I don’t know what could really stop them. I have written about this group to try and expose them, I have gone to the police several times, given videotaped testimony against them in a court case (the interview was with 5 lawyers and took 3 hours), to find safe housing and a way to stay out. I guess each person has to do his best in fighting these people, in the way they feel led to. My skills tend to be in writing, so I am using them.
They are working towards bringing in a new leader, who will usher in a Luciferian reign of joy, prosperity, and rewards to the faithful. The[y] believe that their children are the brightest and best and will be the intellectual elite who will rule over the unintelligent, or “less fit”.
Pure Common Purpose.
You could show people a video taken of a ritual, and they would declare: “it has to be a fake; people just don’t do those things.”
You can show them photos of underground tunnels near Los Alamos, and they will say, “Isn’t that interesting. Must be some government project.”
The evidence is there, but in my opinion, the average person does NOT want to know, and even when confronted with it, will look the other way.
1. A set of weasel words trotted out, including “tinfoil hat”, “rightwing nutters” etc. “I don’t do conspiracies.” “Do” here is a bit like “doing” China in your travels – and it’s individuals without possession of any data which others have put themselves at risk to expose and it’s these individuals who just fling epithets as some sort of gainsaying counterargument.
2. Control of all outlets of information not toeing the line, e.g. the FB business just now, Zucker targetted, Twitter has clearly been doing it, soon it will be blogs – mine’s gone down three times.
3. Control of the MSM – the online community know all about this, most of that lot out there are blissfully unaware, still.
4. The disbelief at anything major, mentioned by Svali.
5. Counter-campaigns, e.g. “welcome refugees”, show “love and tolerance” to these displaced children, whilst meanwhile, the killings and rapes continue unabated, the grooming. Dare to criticize it and the local constabulary come for you.
All that we know already but it’s far worse in the light of FoS’s comments at the top of the post – just how does one reverse it?
Profiles of courage – those in the know
People who put themselves on the line out there, e.g. Tommy Robinson, people who actually go to prison, are set upon, are largely undefended.
Our regular forces who at least have job security but lay down their lives each day nonetheless, unsung.
People who don’t run the risks Tommy Robinson or forces people do but still get vilified, their prospects ended – the Farages, Rees-Moggs, Katie Hopkinses – they do have a small degree of protection for now.
Major pundits in the alt-media, e.g. Vox Day, Stefan Molyneux, Brittany Pettibone [now].
People like other bloggers and yours truly whose traffic is not large enough to worry the PTB all that much and so this is a nice place for us to be for now – this is the echelon where the message can still get out, albeit to a few thousand, nothing like the great masses out there … but without being constantly taken down.
We do run risks though – I have blocks on my phones and all sorts of failsafes, perimeter defences at home, I’ve been threatened more times than I care to remember.
People who comment at our sites. There is some risk for you.
Society has been restructured to prevent pushback
Nowhere in the above, except in echelons 1 and 2 is anyone actually doing anything to reverse the PTB push because that push is so hidden and powerful, so entrenched.
Their current Kalergi plan is so open, so blatant, and yet the situation is near irreversible – especially once the Muslims are in, because once they’re in, they fight hammer and tongs to resist any pushback and have the infrastructure and money to merge with the PTB themselves for the time being.
There is literally a parallel society being set up alongside us, sucking up welfare money and other benefits, at least not taking jobs, and it is a society of physical confrontation and crimes against humanity, from Rotherham and Telford to the bombings to no go zones to howling hyena prayer calls five times a day – jihadi training grounds.
This really is the N1 issue today – benefits and deficits can always be recovered in a decade, dumbing down in education in two decades but the influx of a parallel society cannot be reversed, not without the methods FoS alludes to and who’s going to start that happening?
Only the very PTB who are causing it all – they’ve even orchestrated our backlash.
Those in most danger
Go back to the echelons list – that’s the order of danger. Why don’t all of us join the top echelon?
Because we have things to lose, don’t we? I know someone who is sixth echelon and while he makes noises about it being good that Blair is executed etc., he would never do anything about it because he has a job and extended family. I’ve lost my family and so I can move up one echelon. That’s the way it works.
What is it going to take?
This is the whole issue – just what will it take for more than just a few people to start pushing back?
Blonde in the Belly of the Beast asked just what it’s going to take, what kind of atrocity to stop the idiot Millennials and their “refugee welcome” bollox, their university hurt feelings learning – just what will it take for these little idiots to wake up? The Jennifer Lawrences too.